Health Care Priorities: The Community's Preferences For Using Community Preferences
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$52,355.00
Summary
Determining how health care resources should be allocated - often termed rationing or priority setting - has traditionally been carried out by health care personnel, usually doctors but increasingly managers. More recently there has been a move to involve the general public in this process. Much of the research in this area has focussed on the methods used to elicit community preferences. While this is an important area of investigation, a prior issue of how community members feel about the use ....Determining how health care resources should be allocated - often termed rationing or priority setting - has traditionally been carried out by health care personnel, usually doctors but increasingly managers. More recently there has been a move to involve the general public in this process. Much of the research in this area has focussed on the methods used to elicit community preferences. While this is an important area of investigation, a prior issue of how community members feel about the use of their preferences in informing health care priorities needs to be investigated. Four specific questions will be addressed in this study: (i) do members of the general public feel that, as individuals, they have a legitimate role to play in informing priority decisions in health care? if so why? if not, why not? (ii) does the nature-level-setting of the decisions for which priorities are to be set affect whether individual members of the public would wish to participate in the priority setting process? (e.g. different health services, medical procedures-treatments, diseases) (iii) whose preferences should be used if not the community's? (iv) faced ex post with the preferences of the community and the preferences (possibly different) of health service decision makers (i.e. Oexperts'), does this knowledge affect preferences for having community preferences count? A number of health authorities are currently looking for ways of engaging local communities in health care decision making. This study will indicate the appropriate levels at which community preferences are to be elicited and the type of decisions and settings in which they are most relevant.Read moreRead less
What Do Australians Think About Privacy And Participation In Epidemiological Research?
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$443,015.00
Summary
There is very little research available, in Australia or internationally, about what the general public considers privacy to be; or how important privacy protection is in the context of high and low risk epidemiological studies. We also know little about what affects willingness to participate in epidemiological research. Our research will provide an evidence base, and develop resources for the legislature, the NHMRC, ethics committees and researchers.
What Determines Patients' Adherence To Treatment In Cardiovascular Disease Prevention? A Process Evaluation Of The Kanyini_GAP Trial
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$254,251.00
Summary
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and disability in Australia with a disproportionate burden borne by Aboriginal populations. Despite the existence of proven treatments, adherence to therapy is a major problem. Based on the use of well-established survey methods involving patients, GPs and pharmacists the study seeks to better understand the reasons for non-adherence and why different strategies to address this may or may not be effective.
Calling The Tune? Investigating Corporate Influences On Media Reporting Of Health
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$462,016.00
Summary
This project will examine and evaluate the relationships between Australian journalists and health-related industries (pharmaceutical, medical devices-diagnostics, complementary medicines, food and alcohol) in order to determine the extent to which, and ways in which, these relationships influence the health-related information received by health professionals and the Australian public. The project aims to inform strategies to improve industry and journalistic policy and practices.
Measuring Patient Preferences For Treatment Of Colorectal Cancer Using Discrete Choice Modelling
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$188,912.00
Summary
Around the world, governments, medical professional bodies, individual clinicians and patients are trying to make decisions in health care more rationally. More of these decisions are 'informed' by evidence-based medicine, which depends on a systematic review of all relevant evidence of acceptable scientific rigour. This kind of systematic review has been conducted for the management of colorectal cancer. Patients making choices about possible treatment for colorectal cancer will then have the b ....Around the world, governments, medical professional bodies, individual clinicians and patients are trying to make decisions in health care more rationally. More of these decisions are 'informed' by evidence-based medicine, which depends on a systematic review of all relevant evidence of acceptable scientific rigour. This kind of systematic review has been conducted for the management of colorectal cancer. Patients making choices about possible treatment for colorectal cancer will then have the best 'evidence-based' information to hand. But not enough is known about what aspects of the treatment options matter most to patients. Choosing between different treatment options involves weighing up or trading-off different factors associated with each therapy. Depending on the clinical stage of their cancer, patients may have to choose between the type and size of surgical operation, whether or not to have chemotherapy and-or radiotherapy, the side effects of treatment, the chance of a recurrence of the disease and an early death as well as their quality of life. This research project will ask patients who have already been treated for their colorectal cancer what kind of tradeoffs they make between factors such as disease-free survival, toxicity of treatment and longer term quality of life. This will be done using hypothetical clinical scenarios comparing one type of treatment to another. In this way, the hypothetical choices will be informed by the patient's experience with treatment without asking them to reflect or dwell directly on their own treatment choices. The answers to the hypothetical choice questions can be used to assess what factors in treatment are most important to patients and by how much. This information can then be used by clinicians when presenting evidence-based information on treatment for patients newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.Read moreRead less
Certain Death In Uncertain Time: A Qualitative Study Of The Experience Of Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$221,755.00
Summary
Modern medicine aims to find effective treatments for life-threatening diseases. Cures are seldom found, however. More typically, rapidly fatal diseases gradually become less rapidly fatal. Consequently, there is a category of patients who are certain they will die from their disease or a related factor, but who are equally uncertain as to whether they have weeks or years left to live. It is difficult to discuss this predicament because we do not even have a name for it, let alone a useful termi ....Modern medicine aims to find effective treatments for life-threatening diseases. Cures are seldom found, however. More typically, rapidly fatal diseases gradually become less rapidly fatal. Consequently, there is a category of patients who are certain they will die from their disease or a related factor, but who are equally uncertain as to whether they have weeks or years left to live. It is difficult to discuss this predicament because we do not even have a name for it, let alone a useful terminology to describe it. The absence of discussion exacerbates patients' social isolation. Also, the quality of their remaining life, and the quality of the care they get, depends heavily on the quality of understanding and communication within the social systems that support them. A growing proportion of patients in developed countries fall into this category, including the 1200 Australian women who are diagnosed each year with advanced ovarian cancer. This study aims to increase our understanding of the experience of certain death in uncertain time by recruiting a group of 20 women with advanced ovarian cancer, and interviewing them every few months over three years. The study will explore all aspects of the experience of having advanced ovarian cancer, and generate a terminology for it - one that grows out of the women's own language. The study will inform the organisation and delivery of clinical care and services to women with ovarian cancer. It will also inform patient education programs, and help to tune medical education to the particular needs and perceptions of patients who are experiencing the certainty of death in uncertain time. Finally, the researchers will also explore the implications of the findings for medical ethics and health law, and for communication, information and decision-making in cancer medicine.Read moreRead less
Long Term Impact, Capacity Gains And Cost-effectiveness Of A Successful Community-wide Child Obesity Prevention Program
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$703,191.00
Summary
Be Active, Eat Well is the first community-wide obesity prevention project to successfully reduce the weight and waist gain of children. The 'intervention' was to 'boost' community capacity to enable the local organisations to create their own solutions to childhood obesity. This research will continue to assess the project 3 years after that 'boost' to determine the long-term sustainability, impact and cost-effectiveness of this approach to prevent childhood obesity.