ARDC Research Link Australia Research Link Australia   BETA Research
Link
Australia
  • ARDC Newsletter Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Explore Collaborations
2026 ARDC Annual Survey is now open!

The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) invites you to participate in a short survey about your interaction with the ARDC and use of our national research infrastructure and services. The survey will take approximately 5 minutes and is anonymous. It’s open to anyone who uses our digital research infrastructure services including Reasearch Link Australia.

We will use the information you provide to improve the national research infrastructure and services we deliver and to report on user satisfaction to the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) program.

Please take a few minutes to provide your input. The survey closes COB Friday 29 May 2026.

Complete the 5 min survey now by clicking on the link below.

Take Survey Now

Thank you.

  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation

Need help searching? View our Search Guide.

Advanced Search

Current Selection
Socio-Economic Objective : Justice and the law not elsewhere classified
Research Topic : Commercial
Clear All
Filter by Field of Research
Commercial And Contract Law (6)
Law (6)
Corporations And Associations Law (2)
Tort Law (2)
Equity Law (1)
Intellectual Property (1)
Jurisprudence And Legal Theory (1)
Justice And Legal Studies Not Elsewhere Classified (1)
Law Not Elsewhere Classified (1)
Property Law And Conveyancing (Excl. Intellectual Property) (1)
Research, Science And Technology Policy (1)
Filter by Socio-Economic Objective
Justice and the law not elsewhere classified (6)
Understanding legal processes (2)
Bioethics (1)
Consumer affairs (1)
Industry policy (1)
Law enforcement (1)
Technological and organisational innovation (1)
Filter by Funding Provider
Australian Research Council (6)
Filter by Status
Closed (6)
Filter by Scheme
Discovery Projects (6)
Filter by Country
Australia (6)
Filter by Australian State/Territory
VIC (3)
TAS (2)
ACT (1)
NSW (1)
  • Researchers (5)
  • Funded Activities (6)
  • Organisations (21)
  • Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP1097253

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $276,000.00
    Summary
    Safeguarding the financial well-being of Australians by improving financial literacy: Implications for consumer protection laws. The project will contribute to a broader understanding of the role of financial literacy in Australia and its relationship with Australia's financial services and consumer protection laws. Having financially literate consumers facilitates the uptake and development of innovative financial products. This is essential for promoting an innovation culture and economy. High .... Safeguarding the financial well-being of Australians by improving financial literacy: Implications for consumer protection laws. The project will contribute to a broader understanding of the role of financial literacy in Australia and its relationship with Australia's financial services and consumer protection laws. Having financially literate consumers facilitates the uptake and development of innovative financial products. This is essential for promoting an innovation culture and economy. Higher levels of financial literacy also enable consumers to plan better for their and their families' financial well-being. This also has national benefit as it means that consumers are better prepared to deal with the adverse financial consequences of job-loss, illness, disablement or death, thus reducing the stresses and demands on Australia's social welfare safety net.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0987668

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $138,931.00
    Summary
    Policy-Based Reasoning in Private Law. The Australian community devotes a great deal of attention to improving the regulation of commercial and consumer relations through participative, public processes such as law reform commissions and parliamentary inquiries. The important role of judicial law-making in regulating economic and social relations is often overlooked. This project will examine the way in which the pursuit of policy goals influences judicial law-making in the private law sphere. T .... Policy-Based Reasoning in Private Law. The Australian community devotes a great deal of attention to improving the regulation of commercial and consumer relations through participative, public processes such as law reform commissions and parliamentary inquiries. The important role of judicial law-making in regulating economic and social relations is often overlooked. This project will examine the way in which the pursuit of policy goals influences judicial law-making in the private law sphere. The project will make an important contribution to the international debate about the legitimacy of policy considerations in judicial-making in private law, and the extent of the legitimate law-making role of the courts in a democratic system.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0878545

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $157,618.00
    Summary
    The Liability of Corporate Groups. The importance of a re-examination of the rules of limited liability has been demonstrated in many recent cases of corporate wrongdoing and collapse. This has been highlighted by the restructuring of the James Hardie Group of companies, the conscious aim of which was the decision to free the group of its asbestos liability 'legacy'. Were it not for government intervention, thousands of persons injured by asbestos products would have gone without compensation. .... The Liability of Corporate Groups. The importance of a re-examination of the rules of limited liability has been demonstrated in many recent cases of corporate wrongdoing and collapse. This has been highlighted by the restructuring of the James Hardie Group of companies, the conscious aim of which was the decision to free the group of its asbestos liability 'legacy'. Were it not for government intervention, thousands of persons injured by asbestos products would have gone without compensation. One means by which such unfairness can be avoided is by reform to the rules of limited liability. This project will explore the means by which this could be achieved.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0208258

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $364,323.00
    Summary
    Legal and Ethical Regulation of the Use and Commercialisation of Human Biological Material. The Australian government has a policy of promoting expertise in genomics. An essential ingredient of research and development of the genomics industry is access to human biological material. A clear regulatory framework is required, consistent with national ethical principles. There is lack of clarity, legally and ethically, in relation to ownership (including derivative claims), consented and un-consent .... Legal and Ethical Regulation of the Use and Commercialisation of Human Biological Material. The Australian government has a policy of promoting expertise in genomics. An essential ingredient of research and development of the genomics industry is access to human biological material. A clear regulatory framework is required, consistent with national ethical principles. There is lack of clarity, legally and ethically, in relation to ownership (including derivative claims), consented and un-consented use, contracts, conflict of interest and benefit sharing in human biological material, including regenerative tissue. Clarification will facilitate ethical research and commercialisation. These issues will be analysed systematically with recommendations for Australia consistent with international standards.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0557608

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $331,586.00
    Summary
    Co-operative intellectual property management and technology transfer for the Australian biotechnology industry. The Australian biotechnology industry rests on a framework of internationally competitive research and should be well placed to capture a significant share of expanding global markets. However, existing intellectual property (IP) management strategies do not make the most of this potential because they raise barriers to much-needed co-operation among industry players. By developing an .... Co-operative intellectual property management and technology transfer for the Australian biotechnology industry. The Australian biotechnology industry rests on a framework of internationally competitive research and should be well placed to capture a significant share of expanding global markets. However, existing intellectual property (IP) management strategies do not make the most of this potential because they raise barriers to much-needed co-operation among industry players. By developing and refining new co-operative IP management models in an Australian context, this project offers direct economic benefits (more efficient industry structures), improved social and economic benefits (better and cheaper biotechnology products and services), and an opportunity for Australia to take the lead in developing innovative approaches to IP management.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0774419

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $124,000.00
    Summary
    Models of contract law: are broad principles better than detailed rules? Empirical confirmation that broad principles work better than detailed rules could lead to many economic and social benefits- it would supply a key to simplifying the law; contracts would be shorter and simpler, reducing the costs of doing business; contract disputes and litigation would be reduced, saving public and private expense; decision-making would be more accountable and transparent, improving the quality of justice .... Models of contract law: are broad principles better than detailed rules? Empirical confirmation that broad principles work better than detailed rules could lead to many economic and social benefits- it would supply a key to simplifying the law; contracts would be shorter and simpler, reducing the costs of doing business; contract disputes and litigation would be reduced, saving public and private expense; decision-making would be more accountable and transparent, improving the quality of justice; codifying the law would be more feasible; and harmonising Australian contract law with that of our international trade partners would be facilitated. The project thus has the potential to contribute to strengthening Australia's social and economic fabric (Priority Goal 4 of National Research Priority 2).
    Read more Read less
    More information

    Showing 1-6 of 6 Funded Activites

    Advanced Search

    Advanced search on the Researcher index.

    Advanced search on the Funded Activity index.

    Advanced search on the Organisation index.

    National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy

    The Australian Research Data Commons is enabled by NCRIS.

    ARDC CONNECT NEWSLETTER

    Subscribe to the ARDC Connect Newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest digital research news, events, resources, career opportunities and more.

    Subscribe

    Quick Links

    • Home
    • About Research Link Australia
    • Product Roadmap
    • Documentation
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact ARDC

    We acknowledge and celebrate the First Australians on whose traditional lands we live and work, and we pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.

    Copyright © ARDC. ACN 633 798 857 Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Accessibility Statement
    Top
    Quick Feedback