ARDC Research Link Australia Research Link Australia   BETA Research
Link
Australia
  • ARDC Newsletter Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Explore Collaborations
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation

Need help searching? View our Search Guide.

Advanced Search

Current Selection
Field of Research : Law
Research Topic : CITIZENSHIP
Australian State/Territory : NSW
Clear All
Filter by Field of Research
Law (7)
Constitutional Law (4)
Administrative Law (2)
Comparative Law (2)
Human Rights Law (2)
Constitutionalism And Constitutional Law (1)
Criminology (1)
Family Law (1)
History and Philosophy of Law and Justice (1)
Indigenous Law (1)
International Law (excl. International Trade Law) (1)
Justice Systems And Administration (1)
Law and Society (1)
Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems) (1)
Filter by Socio-Economic Objective
Citizenship and National Identity (3)
Civics and Citizenship (3)
Law Reform (3)
Civics and citizenship (2)
Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies (2)
Justice and the law not elsewhere classified (2)
Defence and Security Policy (1)
Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified (1)
Public Services Policy Advice and Analysis (1)
Religion and Society (1)
Studies in human society (1)
Filter by Funding Provider
Australian Research Council (7)
Filter by Status
Closed (5)
Active (2)
Filter by Scheme
Discovery Projects (5)
Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (1)
Special Research Initiatives (1)
Filter by Country
Australia (7)
Filter by Australian State/Territory
NSW (7)
ACT (3)
VIC (2)
QLD (1)
  • Researchers (6)
  • Funded Activities (7)
  • Organisations (7)
  • Active Funded Activity

    Special Research Initiatives - Grant ID: SR200200550

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $113,075.00
    Summary
    Citizenship and Claims of Belonging in Australian Law and History. What does it mean legally to ‘be’ an Australian? What role does the law play in shaping theories of belonging to Australia, and concepts of citizenship and Australian nationhood? The Project will address these questions, exploring key constitutional cases in which individual claims to ‘belong’ were the central issue. It will address fundamental issues about the relationship between citizenship and membership of the Australian com .... Citizenship and Claims of Belonging in Australian Law and History. What does it mean legally to ‘be’ an Australian? What role does the law play in shaping theories of belonging to Australia, and concepts of citizenship and Australian nationhood? The Project will address these questions, exploring key constitutional cases in which individual claims to ‘belong’ were the central issue. It will address fundamental issues about the relationship between citizenship and membership of the Australian community, contextualizing these in the social and political culture of their time. Outcomes include a historically grounded understanding of what makes Australian society cohere, and the challenges created at key points in time by shifting and sometimes conflicting legal and social visions of Australian citizenship.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP120101590

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $181,500.00
    Summary
    A Federation of cultures? Innovative approaches to multicultural accommodation. This project examines how state and federal governments can better protect and support the values, beliefs and cultural practices of different cultural and religious groups, especially in matters concerning family life, community identity and freedom of conscience, within a framework of respect for human rights.
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Early Career Researcher Award - Grant ID: DE160101123

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $375,000.00
    Summary
    Conditional citizenship? Revocation's implications for Australians. This project aims to study the implications of the proposed citizenship changes in Australia. Spurred by a potential terrorist threat from citizens, the government has proposed expanded powers to strip a person of their Australian citizenship. Proposed as an instrument of counter-terrorism policy, the expansion of powers over citizenship also has significant implications for fundamental principles of Australian law and for the v .... Conditional citizenship? Revocation's implications for Australians. This project aims to study the implications of the proposed citizenship changes in Australia. Spurred by a potential terrorist threat from citizens, the government has proposed expanded powers to strip a person of their Australian citizenship. Proposed as an instrument of counter-terrorism policy, the expansion of powers over citizenship also has significant implications for fundamental principles of Australian law and for the very nature of Australian citizenship, which is a key legal link between individual and state. The project plans to draw on the experience of countries comparable with Australia and relevant theory. It aims to provide guidelines for policy makers and to benefit debate on the legal constitution and nature of the Australian community.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0208174

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $304,083.00
    Summary
    Public Law Implications of Treaty Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australians. Australia is the only Commonwealth country that has never signed an official treaty with its Indigenous peoples. It is not surprising then that a treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians has been cited as a goal of the reconciliation process by bodies including the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. Unfortunately, there has been little academic examination of the merits or content of a treaty .... Public Law Implications of Treaty Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australians. Australia is the only Commonwealth country that has never signed an official treaty with its Indigenous peoples. It is not surprising then that a treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians has been cited as a goal of the reconciliation process by bodies including the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. Unfortunately, there has been little academic examination of the merits or content of a treaty, or of how a treaty might be accommodated within Australia's constitutional structure. With the benefit of comparative analysis, this project will provide a scholarly investigation of the role that a treaty could play under Australian law.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0988404

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $245,000.00
    Summary
    Juror confidence in justice: democratic participation or deference to authority? Australia will be better protected from terrorism and crime if its justice system has the confidence of its citizens. Currently it does not. Without such confidence, justice offers neither a credible deterrent nor a protector of rights. Courts are typically designed and run using a hierarchical model of authority, while new therapeutic and restorative approaches make justice processes more democratic. There is litt .... Juror confidence in justice: democratic participation or deference to authority? Australia will be better protected from terrorism and crime if its justice system has the confidence of its citizens. Currently it does not. Without such confidence, justice offers neither a credible deterrent nor a protector of rights. Courts are typically designed and run using a hierarchical model of authority, while new therapeutic and restorative approaches make justice processes more democratic. There is little evidence of how either of these impacts on justice for participants. Understanding the process by which people develop trust during one critical adjudicative process, the jury trial, will allow juries, and other forms of lay decision-making in judicial processes, to be used more effectively in the justice system.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Active Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP220101675

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $330,000.00
    Summary
    The role of community sponsorship for refugee resettlement in Australia . This Project aims to conduct the first large-scale comparative study of community or private sponsorship of refugee resettlement in Australia and other jurisdictions. It will generate ground-breaking insights into Australia’s role historically in community sponsorship of refugee resettlement and identify the legal and policy background of current successful community sponsorship programs. Expected outcomes include clarity .... The role of community sponsorship for refugee resettlement in Australia . This Project aims to conduct the first large-scale comparative study of community or private sponsorship of refugee resettlement in Australia and other jurisdictions. It will generate ground-breaking insights into Australia’s role historically in community sponsorship of refugee resettlement and identify the legal and policy background of current successful community sponsorship programs. Expected outcomes include clarity and policy guidance about how community or private sponsorship is understood, conceived and implemented globally; and better knowledge about the motives of community sponsors. This Project will position Australia as a world leader in practice and research on community or private sponsorship for refugee resettlement.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP130101954

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $170,500.00
    Summary
    The court as archive: rethinking the institutional role of federal superior courts of record. This project examines the institutional role of federal superior courts of record to ground an analysis of their responsibilities as curators of a significant national archive. It will provide principles for the administration of court records that respond to the competing legal and civic demands of contemporary Australian society.
    More information

    Showing 1-7 of 7 Funded Activites

    Advanced Search

    Advanced search on the Researcher index.

    Advanced search on the Funded Activity index.

    Advanced search on the Organisation index.

    National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy

    The Australian Research Data Commons is enabled by NCRIS.

    ARDC CONNECT NEWSLETTER

    Subscribe to the ARDC Connect Newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest digital research news, events, resources, career opportunities and more.

    Subscribe

    Quick Links

    • Home
    • About Research Link Australia
    • Product Roadmap
    • Documentation
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact ARDC

    We acknowledge and celebrate the First Australians on whose traditional lands we live and work, and we pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.

    Copyright © ARDC. ACN 633 798 857 Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Accessibility Statement
    Top
    Quick Feedback