Discovery Early Career Researcher Award - Grant ID: DE240100652
Funder
Australian Research Council
Funding Amount
$426,000.00
Summary
Mobilising Litigation to Effect Legal, Policy and Social Change. This project will be the first comprehensive study of movement litigation from an Australian perspective. Using an innovative blend of socio-legal methods, the outcomes include an examination of movement litigation actors and their democratic role, a methodological framework for global scholarship on movement litigation and the first international and comparative study of refugee rights movement litigation. These outcomes will gene ....Mobilising Litigation to Effect Legal, Policy and Social Change. This project will be the first comprehensive study of movement litigation from an Australian perspective. Using an innovative blend of socio-legal methods, the outcomes include an examination of movement litigation actors and their democratic role, a methodological framework for global scholarship on movement litigation and the first international and comparative study of refugee rights movement litigation. These outcomes will generate new knowledge for forced migration studies and have the potential to transform the discipline of law by providing tools for a broader and more contextual approach for the study of jurisprudence. Benefits include lessons for enhancing participatory democracy and promoting progressive social and legal change.Read moreRead less
Taking control: variations in forced psychiatric treatment in the community. This interdisciplinary project aims to produce a comprehensive understanding of the drivers underpinning variations in the use of legal orders to enforce psychiatric treatment in the community without consent. Australia’s rate of use of these controversial orders is very high and there are unexplained variations in rates of use within and between jurisdictions, with some minority groups disproportionately affected. Unco ....Taking control: variations in forced psychiatric treatment in the community. This interdisciplinary project aims to produce a comprehensive understanding of the drivers underpinning variations in the use of legal orders to enforce psychiatric treatment in the community without consent. Australia’s rate of use of these controversial orders is very high and there are unexplained variations in rates of use within and between jurisdictions, with some minority groups disproportionately affected. Uncovering this knowledge will act as a form of procedural justice for those who have had their human rights limited by compulsion. This knowledge is expected to lead to innovations in law and policy, with subsequent organisational and system improvements, generating profound benefits for those affected by forced treatment. Read moreRead less
Discovery Early Career Researcher Award - Grant ID: DE240100454
Funder
Australian Research Council
Funding Amount
$419,300.00
Summary
A Made in Australia Model for Indigenous-State Treaty-Making. This project aims to address the key public law issues that must be resolved for the negotiation of treaties between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and Australian governments. This project expects to generate new knowledge about the legal, political, institutional, and other factors behind successful treaty-making in the comparative states of Canada and New Zealand and the legal capacity of Australian governments t ....A Made in Australia Model for Indigenous-State Treaty-Making. This project aims to address the key public law issues that must be resolved for the negotiation of treaties between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and Australian governments. This project expects to generate new knowledge about the legal, political, institutional, and other factors behind successful treaty-making in the comparative states of Canada and New Zealand and the legal capacity of Australian governments to engage in treaty-making. Expected outcomes of this project include the development of uniquely innovative and flexible ‘made in Australia’ models of treaty-making that are constitutionally viable. This should provide significant benefits, such as improving the likelihood of successful treaty processes.Read moreRead less