ORCID Profile
0000-0002-0297-4285
Current Organisation
University of South Australia
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2016
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 15-05-2013
Abstract: We herein report detailed investigations into the interaction of Lewis acidic fluoroboranes, for ex le BF2Pf (Pf=perfluorophenyl) and BF2Ar(F) (Ar(F)=3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl), with Lewis basic platinum complexes such as [Pt(PEt3)3] and [Pt(PCy3)2] (Cy=cyclohexyl). Two presumed Lewis adducts could be identified in solution and corresponding secondary products of these Lewis adducts were characterized in the solid state. Furthermore, the concept of frustrated Lewis pairs (FLP) was applied to the activation of ethene in the system [Pt(BPf3)(CH2CH2)(dcpp)] (dcpp=1,3-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)propane Pf=perfluorophenyl). Finally, DFT calculations were performed to determine the interaction between the platinum-centered Lewis bases and the boron-centered Lewis acids. Additionally, several possible mechanisms for the oxidative addition of the boranes BF3, BCl3, and BF2Ar(F) to the model complex [Pt(PMe3)2] are presented.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2010
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2023
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3319545
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 12-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3452983
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2021
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3773960
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 12-09-2018
DOI: 10.1111/IRFI.12231
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2021
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 21-06-2013
DOI: 10.1108/IJMF-03-2012-0028
Abstract: The analysis aims to explore how momentum return changes with alternative computational methods and the extent to which the portfolio structure is important in the momentum context. The focus reflected in the prior research emphasises the method used by Jegadeesh and Titman and various extensions to test whether momentum returns exist. This study uses alternative methods of buying previous Winners and short‐selling previous Losers to determine if this significantly changes the returns. The current study clarifies the impact of several contributory factors that impact upon estimated momentum returns. The large s le of cleaned data upon which this study is based provides a higher degree of confidence that the findings are sound and not just a statistical anomaly. The research is important from a practitioner perspective as details of momentum return are presented for each country using different methods, providing information regarding the most profitable country in which to invest and whether the momentum return is sustainable under different formative approaches. One of the important contributions of this study is a detailed empirical analysis, presenting results in a global context rather than on a single country basis.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 05-2009
DOI: 10.1177/097265270900800204
Abstract: The application of contrarian strategies in the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) are examined in this paper, shedding further light on competing explanations underlying this anomaly. Three specific issues are investigated using several models. First, can a trader book a profit by employing a contrarian strategy? The test portfolio earned a contrarian profit of 74.40 per cent above the market return. Second, risk differences between Winner and Loser portfolios are found to be an independent phenomenon. Third, the size of the firm appears to play a vital role in explaining the overreaction hypothesis.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3021445
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2008
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2901338
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 31-08-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2013
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3282817
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2020
No related grants have been discovered for Kartick Gupta.