ORCID Profile
0000-0003-3341-5635
Current Organisation
University of South Australia
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Environment And Resource Economics | Natural Resource Management | Environment and Resource Economics | Ecological Economics | Environmental Science and Management | Applied Economics | Sociology | Applied Sociology, Program Evaluation And Social Impact Assessment | Social Change |
Land and water management | Microeconomic issues not elsewhere classified | Work not elsewhere classified | Ecological Economics | Rural Water Policy | Environmental and resource evaluation not elsewhere classified
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Date: 08-2008
DOI: 10.2166/WST.2008.681
Abstract: In Australia there is a growing awareness that the over-allocation of water entitlements to irrigators needs to be reduced so that environmental flow allocations can be increased. This means that some water will need to be acquired from irrigators and returned to the environment. Most current water reform policies assume that irrigators are solely motivated by profit and will be willing sellers of water, but this might be an untenable approach. Authorities will need to consider new ways of encouraging the participation of irrigators in water reform. The main aim of this research was to identify the non-commercial influences acting on irrigators' behaviour, especially the influence of the values that they hold toward family, land, water, community and lifestyle. The study also aimed to investigate whether it is possible to group irrigators according to these values and then use the groupings to describe how these might affect their willingness to participate in environmental reforms. We clustered the irrigators into three groups with differing orientations (i) Investors [25%]—profit oriented, (ii) Lifestylers [25%]–lifestyle oriented, (iii) Providers [50%]–family-succession oriented. This research indicates that when designing policy instruments to acquire water for environmental purposes policy-makers should pay more attention to the factors influencing irrigators' decision making, especially non-commercial factors.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-1970
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-02-2018
Publisher: Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources
Date: 2008
DOI: 10.3178/HRL.2.27
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2013
DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2013.06.046
Abstract: Many attempts to implement resource management initiatives in Canadian and international communities have been resisted by stakeholders despite inclusion of their representatives in the decision-making process. Managers' failure to understand stakeholders' perspectives when proposing initiatives is a potential cause of this resistance. Our study uses marketing thought to enhance stakeholder theory by bringing in an audience-centric perspective. We attempt to understand how stakeholders perceive their interests in an organization and consequently decide how to influence that organization. By doing so, we investigate whether a disconnect exists between the perceptions of managers and those of stakeholders. Natural resource managers can utilize this knowledge to garner stakeholder support for the organization and its activities. We support this claim with findings from a water transfer plebiscite held in the Canadian province of Alberta. Sixteen personal interviews employing narrative inquiry were conducted to document voters' (i.e., irrigators') interpretations.
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 08-11-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-09-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-12-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-03-2018
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 02-09-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2013
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2010
DOI: 10.2495/SI100151
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-08-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-08-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2014
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 30-06-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 18-06-2020
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2008
DOI: 10.2495/WM080891
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 05-12-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WS110161
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2023
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 17-03-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 14-09-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2014
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120391
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2016
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120031
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2008
DOI: 10.4296/CWRJ3303283
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2013
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 27-05-2008
DOI: 10.2495/SI080071
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 05-12-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WS110431
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2010
DOI: 10.2495/SI100201
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-08-2006
DOI: 10.2495/SI060281
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-03-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2010
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 03-07-2012
DOI: 10.2495/EID120371
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-08-2020
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 04-09-2013
DOI: 10.2495/WS130261
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 18-08-2009
DOI: 10.2495/WRM090281
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 27-10-2009
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 14-11-2014
DOI: 10.3390/W6113457
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Date: 19-05-2006
DOI: 10.1061/40856(200)4
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 17-06-2014
DOI: 10.2495/SI140191
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-06-2020
Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Date: 29-07-2004
DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002852
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2007
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2018
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-01-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-10-2021
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1068/C10142
Abstract: The problem of water overallocation in many regions of the world involves how to include environmental flow provisions for long-term sustainability of river systems, especially under scarce supply conditions. Market mechanisms have provided pathways for returning water to rivers for environmental use. We argue that it is important to consider how both market mechanisms and initial water allocation models contribute to achieving satisfactory environmental flow outcomes. The Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) in Australia has had policy processes applied to it for almost twenty years to address these issues, and provides an excellent basis for case-study analysis. Two MDB case studies are used to consider differences in the interpretation and implementation of environmental flow requirements, and the potential for institutional inertia of the systems within which water markets operate. We identify two simplified models from these case studies—one prioritising environmental rights above consumptive extraction and the other prioritising consumptive and environmental rights equally. However, neither of these case-study models provides the full environmental flow spectrum of base in-stream flows to over-bank flush events. Our findings suggest that combining allocation and market-based rights (a third model) offers an effective means to deliver full-spectrum environmental flows. If governments provide prioritised environmental rights for base in-stream ecosystem benefits, together with targeted temporary and permanent water market acquisitions to meet environmental needs associated with over-bank floods and flushes, there will be lower potential for shortfalls relative to targeted environmental flow outcomes.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2020
Publisher: World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Date: 09-2016
DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X16500260
Abstract: Despite the importance of adopting improved irrigation technologies to increase on-farm irrigation efficiency, our understanding of what determines farmers’ adoption decisions in southern Alberta remains relatively poor. The overall goals of this study are to examine the extent of adoption (proportion of all irrigators that have started the adoption process), how far along they are in the adoption process, and the intensity of adoption (percentage of irrigated land on which the technology is adopted) of improved irrigation technologies in southern Alberta, and to assess the major factors that influenced farmers’ adoption decisions. The data were collected in a farm-household survey conducted in the 12 largest irrigation districts (IDs) as well as among private irrigators in southern Alberta. Results show that adoption of improved irrigation technologies is widespread at various levels of intensity. By 2011, 81.3% of farmers had started the adoption process, are now using some kind of improved technology to apply water to their crops, and used it on 76.8% of all irrigated land. The most commonly used irrigation technology is a low pressure center pivot system. Receiving support services following the adoption decision played an important role in increasing the intensity of adoption. Obtaining information on irrigation technologies from in idual farmers or farmers’ associations, and extension agencies significantly influenced farmers’ decisions to adopt. Farmers who increased their social capital through attending meetings related to agricultural production practices were more likely to adopt while farmers who participated in recreational or social organizations were less likely to adopt. Finally, the extent and intensity of adoption are higher for those with corporate farm structure, larger families, more generations of ownership and higher education.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 30-01-2008
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-01-2014
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120371
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 15-06-2015
DOI: 10.2495/WRM150281
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 04-05-2007
DOI: 10.2495/WRM070451
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 03-02-2022
DOI: 10.1007/S12571-022-01256-1
Abstract: This article is the third in a series of historical reviews on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), exploring why agricultural production and irrigation schemes are underperforming, and how this contributes to high levels of food insecurity. The expression ‘food security’ emerged in 1974 following the Sahel and Darfur famines. Despite SSA being a net agricultural exporter, food insecurity has persisted and is increasing. This is largely a legacy of the export-oriented colonial agricultural production systems, which procured scarce fertile land, water and labour to meet the needs of industries and consumers in the Global North. Colonialism also undermined the social contract between traditional leaders and communities, which had been instrumental in managing food scarcity in earlier times. Post-independence, agricultural policies remained focused on exports and neglected critical research and investment: integrating food productions systems into the domestic economy developing supply chains and associated market, storage and value-adding infrastructure and introducing appropriate technologies. As a result, Africa is the only region in the world where increased export production caused a decline in per capita food production. African nations should be extracted from the debt accrued due to poor colonial investments, World Bank lending practices, and global currency and interest fluctuations, which have crippled their capacity to support agriculture and improve livelihoods and food security. Farming needs to be profitable, which includes farmers being connected to domestic supply chains and market signals, local value-adding, and post-harvest storage. This will create jobs and increase income earning capacity, which is the key to households’ food security.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2008
DOI: 10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2008.07.001
Abstract: The processes associated with cadaver decomposition in outdoor settings, particularly those that occur during the extended postmortem interval (>30 days) are poorly understood. Thus, few methods are currently available to accurately estimate the extended postmortem interval (PMI). Of these methods, a soils-based approach has the potential to address the postmortem interval between which entomology and anthropology are the most valuable. Although the validity of soil-based methods has previously been established, little work has been conducted to explain the processes that have been designated for forensic application. As a consequence, we investigated the dynamics of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus-based compounds in soil beneath pig (Sus scrofa) cadavers (gravesoil) that were placed on the soil surface over a period of 100 days. Decomposition was assessed through the physical characteristics of the cadaver, soil pH, soil moisture content, and the concentration of total carbon, total nitrogen, soil-extractable phosphorus, and lipid-phosphorus in soil. Cadaver decomposition did not result in a significant difference in soil carbon and moisture content. However, significant (P<0.05) increases were observed in the concentration of soil pH, total nitrogen, soil-extractable phosphorus, and lipid-phosphorus. Based on the current results, a significant increase in the concentration of gravesoil nutrients represented a maximum PMI of 43 days (lipid-P), 72 days (total nitrogen), or 100 days (soil-extractable phosphorus). This work provides further evidence that a soil-based method has the potential to act as a tool for the estimation of extended PMI.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-03-2018
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 27-05-2008
DOI: 10.2495/SI080011
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-03-2023
DOI: 10.1002/IRD.2821
Abstract: The United Nations calls for action to achieve 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that the current development paradigm is an impediment to achieving several of these goals. We identify 14 agricultural research and development (R& D) needs, which ought to be addressed to achieve critical SDGs. We also identify the paradigm shifts required, particularly from global and international organizations, to facilitate this R& D and implement its outcomes. Importantly, the Global North 2 would have to ert its focus from securing access to cheap land, water and labour that is primarily used to generate agricultural exports and business opportunities for Global North investors. Instead, the focus needs to be on creating opportunities for local farming communities to produce food for domestic markets, increase income and generate local jobs and business opportunities. Circular food systems can support a range of SDG goals, such as no hunger and zero poverty and slow migration, especially of youth, to big cities or foreign lands with insecure jobs.
Publisher: International Information and Engineering Technology Association
Date: 30-09-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-04-2016
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2003
Publisher: Baltzer Science Publishers
Date: 30-04-2014
DOI: 10.7564/13-IJWG29
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 12-12-2012
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2014
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2007
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-05-2017
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120361
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Date: 19-05-2006
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2010
DOI: 10.2495/SI100191
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-05-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WRM110521
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 05-12-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WS110101
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 11-12-2012
DOI: 10.2495/SI120401
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2013
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 27-05-2008
DOI: 10.2495/WP080611
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2005
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2014
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 06-1995
DOI: 10.1108/02637479510083771
Abstract: Presents a discussion of water policies and their influence on land uses and land values, based on empirical data collected from within a proclaimed region in South Australia. Two surveys have been carried out. First, a questionnaire was sent to all 136 licence holders in the proclaimed region, responses being obtained from 56 per cent, which gives a good indication of how present management plans have influenced land use and land and water management and how farmers intend to react to the new management plan. Research finds that the new management plan will achieve its objectives. Second, 60 land transactions within the proclaimed region, during the period 1986‐1992, have been identified and the purchasers interviewed. Based on this survey, the value of irrigation water has been established using financial calculations on gross margin figures for irrigation and non‐irrigation farming.
Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
Date: 2007
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-08-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-09-2015
Publisher: World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Date: 03-2016
DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X16500041
Abstract: Irrigators in the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) of Australia face a salinity triple threat, namely: dryland salinity, surface-water, and groundwater salinity. Water trading has now been adopted to the point where it is a common adaptation tool used by the majority of irrigators in the Basin. This study uses a number of unique water market and spatial databases to investigate the association between the severity and extent of areas which suffer from salinity and permanent trade over time, holding other regional characteristics constant. It was found that larger volumes of permanent water were likely to be sold from areas suffering from higher dryland salinity. In addition, increases in the concentration of groundwater salinity was found to decrease volumes of surface-water entitlements sold, providing evidence that groundwater entitlements (where they are viable substitutes) have been increasingly used as substitutes for surface-water entitlements in recent years. Other key influences on water sales included water market prices and net rainfall.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 31-03-2023
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 22-01-2010
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2021
DOI: 10.1111/ICAD.12482
Abstract: Widespread and significant declines of insect population abundances and biomass are currently one of the most pressing issues in entomology, ecology and conservation biology. It has been suggested that artificial light at night is one major driver behind this trend. Recent advances in the gathering and analysis of long‐term data sets of insect population and biomass trends, however, have mostly focused on the effects of climate change and agricultural intensification. We posit here that adequate assessment of artificial night at light that would be required to evaluate its role as a driver of insect declines is far from trivial. Currently its implementation into entomological monitoring programmes and long‐running ecological experiments is h ered by several challenges that arise due to (i) its relatively late appearance as a bio ersity threat on the research agenda and (ii) the interdisciplinary nature of the research field where biologists, physicists and engineers still need to develop a set of standardised assessment methods that are both biologically meaningful and easy to implement. As more studies that address these challenges are urgently needed, this article aims to provide a short overview of the few existing studies that have attempted to investigate longer‐term effects of artificial light at night on insect populations. To improve the quality and relevance of studies addressing artificial light at night and its effect on insects, we present a set of best practise recommendations where this field needs to be heading in the coming years and how to achieve it.
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 19-05-2015
DOI: 10.2495/SDP150101
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 08-11-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 21-05-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2010
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-05-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WRM110511
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 02-03-2010
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 14-08-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-01-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-12-2011
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Date: 05-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-08-2020
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 10-2002
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-06-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2003
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-05-2012
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2009
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-05-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WRM110541
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 07-10-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2015
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2010
DOI: 10.2495/SI100171
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 04-05-2007
DOI: 10.2495/WRM070241
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-06-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2010
DOI: 10.4296/CWRJ3503339
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2012
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 27-05-2008
DOI: 10.2495/SI080041
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 20-05-2010
DOI: 10.2495/SI100211
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2013
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-11-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-05-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 21-05-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-05-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-05-2020
Publisher: Springer US
Date: 2003
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-05-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-09-2020
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-05-2011
DOI: 10.2495/WRM110531
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-02-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-05-2020
Publisher: WIT Press
Date: 23-08-2006
DOI: 10.2495/SI060221
Start Date: 2014
End Date: 12-2017
Amount: $172,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 06-2010
End Date: 06-2012
Amount: $367,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 12-2004
End Date: 04-2008
Amount: $231,782.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity