ORCID Profile
0000-0003-3120-0964
Current Organisations
Deakin University
,
Deakin University - Geelong Campus at Waurn Ponds
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2022
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 25-09-2019
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 25-08-2021
Abstract: Parental preconception exposures to built and natural outdoor environments could influence pregnancy and birth outcomes either directly, or via a range of health-related behaviours and conditions. However, there is no existing review summarising the evidence linking natural and built characteristics, such as air and noise pollution, walkability, greenness with pregnancy and birth outcomes. Therefore, the planned scoping review aims to collate and map the published literature on parental preconception exposures to built and natural outdoor environments and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) to identify studies for inclusion. Studies will be included if they empirically assess the relationship between maternal and paternal preconception exposures to physical natural and built environment features that occur outdoors in the residential neighbourhood and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then the full text. Data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by one researcher and checked by a second researcher. Results will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, with additional summaries presented as tables and figures. The scoping review will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication, at academic conferences, and published on a website.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2021
DOI: 10.1177/24726303211024562
Abstract: This review discusses the field of coprocytobiology, defined as a combined method of cell preservation, isolation, and cytology, which has applications to the investigation of noninvasive fecal screening for colorectal cancer. In the decade since the field was last reviewed, cell isolation has progressed rapidly via the development of technologies such as microfluidic and magnetic cell sorting. The landscape of cytology has also advanced in this time with the emergence of novel cytological methods and cell preservation strategies. Previous reviews present an outdated and incomplete view of coprocytobiology, summarizing a limited number of early publications, ignoring the principle of cell preservation and focusing on a single method of isolation rather than the field as a whole. In contrast to these publications, this review presents an updated, comprehensive, and unbiased representation of the technical aspects of coprocytobiology and provides unique insight into the common methodological pitfalls, best practice, and future directions of cytological screening for colorectal cancer. This review discusses the field of coprocytobiology, defined as a combined method of cell preservation, isolation, and cytology, which has applications to the investigation of noninvasive fecal screening for colorectal cancer. In the decade since the field was last reviewed, cell isolation has progressed rapidly via the development of technologies such as microfluidic and magnetic cell sorting. The landscape of cytology has also advanced in this time with the emergence of novel cytological methods and cell preservation strategies. Previous reviews present an outdated and incomplete view of coprocytobiology, summarizing a limited number of early publications, ignoring the principle of cell preservation and focusing on a single method of isolation rather than the field as a whole. In contrast to these publications, this review presents an updated, comprehensive, and unbiased representation of the technical aspects of coprocytobiology and provides unique insight into the common methodological pitfalls, best practice, and future directions of cytological screening for colorectal cancer.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 09-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-07-2021
Publisher: Cordoba University Press (UCOPress)
Date: 07-2016
Abstract: Previous research in canids has revealed both group (dog versus wolf) and in idual differences in object choice task (OCT) performance. These differences might be explained by variation in the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene, as intranasally administered oxytocin has recently been shown to improve performance on this task by domestic dogs. This study looked at microsatellites at various distances from the OXTR gene to determine whether there was an association between this gene and: i) species (dog/wolf) and ii) good versus bad OCT performers. Ten primer sets were designed to lify 10 microsatellites that were identified at various distances from the canine OXTR gene. We used 94 (52 males, 42 females) blood s les from shelter dogs, 75 (33 males, 42 females) saliva s les from pet dogs and 12 (6 males, 6 females) captive wolf saliva s les to carry out our analyses. Significant species differences were found in the two markers closest to the OXTR gene, suggesting that this gene may have played an important part in the domestic dogs’ evolution from the wolf. However, no significant, meaningful differences were found in microsatellites between good versus bad OCT performers, which suggests that other factors, such as different training and socialisation experiences, probably impacted task performance.
Location: Australia
No related grants have been discovered for Yen Ting Wong.