ORCID Profile
0000-0003-0655-666X
Current Organisations
Swinburne University of Technology
,
Deakin University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Information Systems Management | Information Systems | Computer Software | Computer System Security | Information Engineering and Theory | Information Systems Development Methodologies | Web Technologies (excl. Web Search) | Database Management
Application Tools and System Utilities | Application Software Packages (excl. Computer Games) | Computer Software and Services not elsewhere classified | Mobile Data Networks and Services | Internet Hosting Services (incl. Application Hosting Services) |
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2015
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 09-2014
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 08-2013
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 04-2010
DOI: 10.1109/CMC.2010.34
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 08-2015
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 12-2014
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 10-2020
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 08-2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 05-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2018
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Date: 28-02-2023
DOI: 10.1145/3545570
Abstract: Multi-turn response selection is a key issue in retrieval-based chatbots and has attracted considerable attention in the NLP (Natural Language processing) field. So far, researchers have developed many solutions that can select appropriate responses for multi-turn conversations. However, these works are still suffering from the semantic mismatch problem when responses and context share similar words with different meanings. In this article, we propose a novel chatbot model based on Semantic Awareness Matching, called SAM. SAM can capture both similarity and semantic features in the context by a two-layer matching network. Appropriate responses are selected according to the matching probability made through the aggregation of the two feature types. In the evaluation, we pick 4 widely used datasets and compare SAM’s performance to that of 12 other models. Experiment results show that SAM achieves substantial improvements, with up to 1.5% R 10 @1 on Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus V2, 0.5% R 10 @1 on Douban Conversation Corpus, and 1.3% R 10 @1 on E-commerce Corpus.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2017
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 03-2015
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2021
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 06-2021
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 09-2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 08-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 23-06-2014
DOI: 10.1002/SEC.1037
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 09-2010
DOI: 10.1109/NSS.2010.69
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 04-2021
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 19-08-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2017
Publisher: EDP Sciences
Date: 07-2016
DOI: 10.1051/ITA/2016021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2014
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 07-2014
DOI: 10.1109/TDSC.2013.49
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 09-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2017
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 23-05-2016
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 06-2017
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2015
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 04-2023
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2018
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2023
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Date: 14-05-2022
DOI: 10.1145/3522759
Abstract: Online social networks (OSNs) are a rich source of information, and the data (including user-generated content) can be mined to facilitate real-world event prediction. However, the dynamic nature of OSNs and the fast-pace nature of social events or hot topics compound the challenge of event prediction. This is a key limitation in many existing approaches. For ex le, our evaluations of six baseline approaches (i.e., logistic regression latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based logistic regression (LR), multi-task learning (MTL), long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural networks, and transformer-based model) on three datasets collected as part of this research (two from Twitter and one from a news collection site 1 ), reveal that the accuracy of these approaches is between 50% and 60%, and they are not capable of utilizing new events in event predictions. Hence, in this article, we develop a novel DNN-based framework (hereafter referred to as event prediction with feedback mechanism— EPFM . Specifically, EPFM makes use of a feedback mechanism based on emerging events detection to improve the performance of event prediction. The feedback mechanism ensembles three outlier detection processes and returns a list of new events. Some of the events will then be chosen by analysts to feed into the fine-tuning process to update the predictive model. To evaluate EPFM, we conduct a series of experiments on the same three datasets, whose findings show that EPFM achieves 80% accuracy in event detection and outperforms the six baseline approaches.We also validate EPFM’s capability of detecting new events by empirically analyzing the feedback mechanism under different thresholds.
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 08-2015
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Date: 07-09-2016
DOI: 10.1145/2968450
Abstract: Traditional tracking solutions in wireless sensor networks based on fixed sensors have several critical problems. First, due to the mobility of targets, a lot of sensors have to keep being active to track targets in all potential directions, which causes excessive energy consumption. Second, when there are holes in the deployment area, targets may fail to be detected when moving into holes. Third, when targets stay at certain positions for a long time, sensors surrounding them have to suffer heavier work pressure than do others, which leads to a bottleneck for the entire network. To solve these problems, a few mobile sensors are introduced to follow targets directly for tracking because the energy capacity of mobile sensors is less constrained and they can detect targets closely with high tracking quality. Based on a realistic detection model, a solution of scheduling mobile sensors and fixed sensors for target tracking is proposed. Moreover, the movement path of mobile sensors has a provable performance bound compared to the optimal solution. Results of extensive simulations show that mobile sensors can improve tracking quality even if holes exist in the area and can reduce energy consumption of sensors effectively.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2018
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 13-01-2017
DOI: 10.3390/S17010139
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 04-2012
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 05-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 20-06-2017
DOI: 10.1002/CPE.4209
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 12-2016
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2017
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2023
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2013
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 29-09-2014
DOI: 10.15439/2014F503
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 07-09-2018
DOI: 10.3390/SYM10090386
Abstract: Traffic prediction is a critical task for intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Prediction at intersections is challenging as it involves various participants, such as vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the accurate intersection traffic prediction by introducing extra data sources other than road traffic volume data into the prediction model. In particular, we take advantage of the data collected from the reports of road accidents and roadworks happening near the intersections. In addition, we investigate two types of learning schemes, namely batch learning and online learning. Three popular ensemble decision tree models are used in the batch learning scheme, including Gradient Boosting Regression Trees (GBRT), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting Trees (XGBoost), while the Fast Incremental Model Trees with Drift Detection (FIMT-DD) model is adopted for the online learning scheme. The proposed approach is evaluated using public data sets released by the Victorian Government of Australia. The results indicate that the accuracy of intersection traffic prediction can be improved by incorporating nearby accidents and roadworks information.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-11-2016
DOI: 10.1002/CPE.4040
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 1
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2017
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 12-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 29-04-2016
DOI: 10.1002/CPE.3485
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 12-2016
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 05-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2013
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2011
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 28-04-2011
DOI: 10.1002/CPE.1747
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 09-2011
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 03-2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 06-2021
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 15-01-2023
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 11-2015
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2017
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 2014
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 09-2010
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Date: 31-01-2022
DOI: 10.1145/3512345
Abstract: Fuzz testing (fuzzing) has witnessed its prosperity in detecting security flaws recently. It generates a large number of test cases and monitors the executions for defects. Fuzzing has detected thousands of bugs and vulnerabilities in various applications. Although effective, there lacks systematic analysis of gaps faced by fuzzing. As a technique of defect detection, fuzzing is required to narrow down the gaps between the entire input space and the defect space. Without limitation on the generated inputs, the input space is infinite. However, defects are sparse in an application, which indicates that the defect space is much smaller than the entire input space. Besides, because fuzzing generates numerous test cases to repeatedly examine targets, it requires fuzzing to perform in an automatic manner. Due to the complexity of applications and defects, it is challenging to automatize the execution of erse applications. In this article, we systematically review and analyze the gaps as well as their solutions, considering both breadth and depth. This survey can be a roadmap for both beginners and advanced developers to better understand fuzzing.
Publisher: ACM
Date: 30-04-2023
Start Date: 01-2019
End Date: 01-2023
Amount: $450,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2022
End Date: 12-2025
Amount: $450,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 07-2019
End Date: 06-2024
Amount: $360,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2020
End Date: 12-2024
Amount: $420,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 10-2021
End Date: 10-2024
Amount: $407,839.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity