ORCID Profile
0000-0003-4714-7918
Current Organisation
University of Tasmania
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 18-01-2021
Publisher: Universidad de Chile
Date: 30-12-2021
DOI: 10.5354/0719-482X.2021.65595
Abstract: La comunidad Antártica ha desarrollado un sistema jurídico, conceptualizado aquí como Derecho Antártico, para abordar los problemas particulares de la región. Este régimen jurídico regional ha regulado las actividades humanas en el continente antártico y sus aguas circundantes durante las últimas seis décadas. A pesar de gozar en la actualidad con la gran aceptación de la sociedad internacional, se observa un análisis abrumadoramente crítico al régimen jurídico Antártico por parte de algunos académicos antárticos, argumentando en favor del establecimiento de un régimen de global o universal para la región. Estos planteos, que no son nuevos y se los consideraba superados, tienen relevancia para Estados como Argentina y Chile quienes han mantenido una postura uniforme y constante a través de la historia: debe ser la comunidad Antártica quien tenga la responsabilidad de regular la región en interés de toda la humanidad. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo por lo tanto responder a dichas críticas, resaltando la importancia de la naturaleza jurídica regional del Derecho Antártico ante los desafíos regionales, y al mismo tiempo, enfatizando el papel que ha jugado y deben continuar jugando Argentina y Chile en su fortalecimiento.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 25-03-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2021
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.1017/S003224742000039X
Abstract: The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) is considered a successful ex le of international governance as it has managed tensions over sovereignty claims, avoided militarisation and dealt with marine resources and environmental protection. Recently, China’s influence and assertiveness in many international institutions have significantly grown. What effect this shift in the international politics will have upon Antarctic governance remains to be seen. However, to further thinking on this issue we explore two current case studies that reveal pressure points within the ATS. First, in the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, Australia has proposed marine protected areas off East Antarctica, to which China and several other states have objected. Second, in the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings, China has proposed special management arrangements for the area around the “Kunlun” station, to which Australia and several other states have objected. Negotiation theory suggests “logrolling” (i.e. trade of mutual decision-making support across issue areas) can be an effective strategy to avoid diplomatic deadlocks. We therefore consider the merits of a logrolling strategy for the above issues. We find that while a logrolling strategy in the ATS might facilitate short-term diplomatic success, it would carry significant risks, including the weakening of existing norms.
Publisher: Brill
Date: 12-12-2021
No related grants have been discovered for Bruno Arpi.