ORCID Profile
0000-0002-0305-9468
Current Organisations
Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science
,
University of Tasmania
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-04-2017
DOI: 10.1002/MET.1654
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-11-2014
Publisher: Brill
Date: 11-03-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-10-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-10-2023
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 07-11-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 11-03-2018
Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.1071/MF18066
Abstract: The mission of Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), established under the Federal Government’s national collaborative research infrastructure program, is to deliver ocean observations to the marine and climate science community. However, the observations have many uses, ranging from real-time operational forecasting to understanding of processes and policy decision making. Observations need to be provided in a format that fits the purpose of the intended application. Turning observations into usable data, time series, gridded products and analyses broadens the use of such observations. Value adding by developing products that are relevant to end-user needs and easily accessible to non-scientists is also required as a strategic response to new and emerging socioeconomic, legal and policy priorities. This paper describes some of the pathways on which IMOS observations are being delivered and used in Australia, demonstrating the value that ocean observations have for society.
Publisher: Brill
Date: 05-12-2015
Abstract: Three substantive areas of analysis have emerged in the legal scholarship of the validity in international law of Antarctic territorial claims. The first is the physical amenability of the Antarctic continent to claims of territory. The second, and largest, is the application of traditional laws of territorial acquisition to Antarctic claims. The alternative argument of Antarctica as res communis is the final substantive thread of discussion. These threads of discussion have dominant arguments. They do not, however, have definite conclusions, leaving the academic conjecture as to the validity of Antarctic territorial claims unresolved. Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty makes an urgent definitive answer unnecessary. However, with new issues emerging related to sovereignty in Antarctica, such as Marine Protected Areas, and more activity from growing Antarctic Treaty membership, public discourse consistently raises the issue. As we enter this new discursive environment, a review of the main arguments of the three substantive areas of legal scholarship is timely. This article will also attempt to identify the dominant attitudes regarding the validity of territorial claims to Antarctica.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 16-05-2016
DOI: 10.1111/REC.12382
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-07-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-07-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2013
Location: Australia
No related grants have been discovered for Indi Hodgson-Johnston.