ORCID Profile
0000-0003-0664-8572
Current Organisation
University of Tasmania
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 09-2013
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2000
Abstract: Methods of assessing group efficacy were examined using a multiparty role play negotiation. Group efficacy is defined as a group’s perceived capability to perform. Three methods of measuring group efficacy were compared: (a) group potency, (b) an aggregation of group members’ estimates, and (c) group discussion. These methods were used to assess group efficacy regarding several group performance characteristics. Analyses were conducted to assess various validity and measurement issues. All methods and types demonstrated construct validity however, predictive validity was modest and varied across the measures. The group discussion method predicted group outcomes better than the potency scale or aggregate method. As expected, generalized efficacy measures predicted general performance indicators, and task-specific measures predicted task-specific performance.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 02-2006
Abstract: Despite the extensive research on culture and intelligence in organizational psychology, little attention has been given to the integration of the two constructs. This special issue aims to stimulate new research directions by synthesizing the two streams of research. In this introduction to the special issue, we propose a framework that reflects and reconciles two different approaches to integrating culture and intelligence—the cultural variation of intelligence approach versus the cultural intelligence approach. Our focus is on the latter approach, which centers on validating the emerging construct called cultural intelligence—defined as the capability to be effective across cultural settings. Specifically, we discuss the measurement and substantive issues that future research should address in advancing our understanding of the cultural intelligence construct.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2004
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2010
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-1992
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2002
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 02-2000
DOI: 10.2307/1556384
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 10-2000
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 21-09-2006
No related grants have been discovered for P. Christopher Earley.