ORCID Profile
0000-0002-7894-8956
Current Organisations
La Trobe University
,
Australian Catholic University
,
Deakin University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 22-05-2017
Abstract: To review studies examining the experience of self-management support in patient–provider interactions and the shaping of goals through interactions. We undertook a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. We searched six databases (2004–2015) for published studies on the provision of self-management support in one-to-one, face-to-face, patient–provider interactions for obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with 14 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Themes identified from studies were (1) dominance of a traditional model of care, encompassing the provision of generic information, exclusion of the psychosocial and temporal nature of interactions and (2) a context of in idual responsibility and accountability, encompassing self-management as patients’ responsibility and adherence, accountability and the attribution of blame. Interactions were constrained by consultation times, patient self-blame and guilt, desire for autonomy and beliefs about what constitutes ‘effective’ self-management. Encounters were oriented towards a traditional model of care delivery and this limited opportunity for collaboration. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals remain in a position of authority, limiting opportunities for control to be shared with patients and shared understandings of social context to be developed.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 26-08-2021
DOI: 10.1177/14407833211038059
Abstract: Self-management is widely promoted in Western health care policies as a way to address the impact of increasing rates of chronic conditions on health care systems. Mostly informed by psychological theories, self-management frameworks and interventions tend to target in idual behaviours as demarcated from the many aspects of social life shaping these behaviours. Using Bourdieu’s theory of practice, we develop four propositions for a relational and socially situated (re)conceptualisation of self-management. First, self-management is a field with its own distinctive logics of practice second, self-management goals are social practices, emerging through co-constituted patient–professional interactions third, self-management is energised by legitimised capital and fourth, what goals feel possible are shaped through embodied knowledge and lived experience (habitus), linked to capital. Collectively these propositions enable focus on both the meanings and resources patients and professionals bring to self-management, along with the dynamic and relational ways goals are produced through patient–professional interactions within the broader field of health care.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2019
DOI: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2019.05.031
Abstract: Premised on the idea that setting goals motivates action and allocation of resources toward a desired future state, goal-setting has become a key component of self-management support. The notions that underpin goal-setting situate self-management firmly within the control and responsibility of in iduals. Yet, we argue that goals are not solely in idual pursuits to be achieved if in iduals have the right knowledge and enough motivation rather, they are social products, influenced by in idual and collective subjectivities, which are structured over time. Drawing primarily on Bourdieu's concept of habitus, along with capital and field, we examine how goals are constructed in self-management support encounters. Seventeen patient-professional dyads comprising 15 patients and 11 health professionals were interviewed on up to three occasions. In total 64 semi-structured interviews were conducted between 2015 and 2017 in Sydney, Australia. Goals were manifested through patient participants' expressions of goal agency (as self-owned wants and opportunities responsibilities to self and others or necessities) goal-oriented dispositions (determined responsible or powerless) temporal orientations (past, present or future) and access to resources to support self-management. These characteristics were grouped into three typologies: 'Goals as opportunities' 'From goals to responsibilities' and 'Necessities when living precariously'. The way goals were constructed was structured over time by present experiences superimposed on past experiences and access to resources. These findings help broaden understandings of the tensions between patient and professionals' goals for living well with chronic conditions and draw attention to the need for structural change to support people to live well with their chronic conditions.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 22-11-2019
Abstract: Self-management is a contemporary model of chronic condition care that places expectations on, and roles for, both patients and health professionals. Health professionals are expected to form partnerships with their patients, and patients are expected to be active participants in their own care. In these new roles, control and responsibility for self-management are shared between people with chronic conditions and their health professionals. We still have limited knowledge about how these new roles are enacted in self-management support. In this article, we examine how health professionals perceive the roles of patients and professionals in chronic condition self-management, drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of field, doxa and capital. In this qualitative study, 32 in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 health professionals in Sydney, Australia. Data were analysed thematically. Three themes were derived. First, there was incongruence between how participants characterised and enacted their roles. Second, participants compartmentalised clinical and non-clinical aspects of self-management support. Finally, the roles of health professionals entwined with emotions and judgements of patienthood revealed that the provision of self-management support was linked to a fit between in iduals’ cultural health capital and the expectations governing the field. We argue that ‘taken for granted’ assumptions about self-management and self-management support must be challenged to mitigate negative social representations and unrealistic expectations placed on patients and health professionals, particularly those patients with less capital, who are more marginalised within clinical interactions.
Publisher: Hindawi Limited
Date: 11-2018
DOI: 10.1111/ECC.12970
Abstract: The impact of a young person's cancer diagnosis extends to siblings, yet support services to address siblings' needs are limited. This study explores healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perspectives on engaging and supporting adolescent and young adult (AYA, 12-25 years) siblings of young cancer patients in hospital settings. Semi-structured interviews with nine HCPs explored participants' views on models of care, engagement and assessment of siblings, available services, barriers to care, and future directions. Participants understood the impact of cancer and need to support AYA siblings, but were unclear how these responsibilities fit in with existing models of care and clinical roles. Siblings' absence from hospitals complicated processes of engagement, assessment and provision of care, challenging some participants to engage siblings outside the clinical context. In the absence of direct contact, HCPs largely relied on patients and parents to report or refer siblings for care. Service and resource limitations further restricted the provision of support to siblings. Despite HCPs' recognition of the need to support siblings, their "invisibility," lack of standardised assessment and service constraints complicate the provision of care in hospital settings. Integrating hospital-based care with community services may better facilitate the engagement and support of AYA siblings.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 06-06-2018
Abstract: A person-centered approach to goal-setting, involving collaboration between patients and health professionals, is advocated in policy to support self-management. However, this is difficult to achieve in practice, reducing the potential effectiveness of self-management support. Drawing on observations of consultations between patients and health professionals, we examined how goal-setting is shaped in patient–provider interactions. Analysis revealed three distinct interactional styles. In controlled interactions, health professionals determine patients’ goals based on biomedical reference points and present these goals as something patients should do. In constrained interactions, patients are invited to present goals, yet health professionals’ language and questions orientate goals toward biomedical issues. In flexible interactions, patients and professionals both contribute to goal-setting, as health professionals use less directive language, create openings, and allow patients to decide on their goals. Findings suggest that interactional style of health professionals could be the focus of interventions when aiming to increase the effectiveness of goal-setting.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 13-07-2015
Abstract: The promotion of choice is a common theme in both policy discourses and commercial marketing claims about healthcare. However, within the multiple potential pathways of the healthcare ‘maze’, how do healthcare ‘consumers’ or patients understand and experience choice? What is meant by ‘choice’ in the policy context, and, importantly from a sociological perspective, how are such choices socially produced and structured? In this theoretical article, the authors consider the interplay of Bourdieu’s three key, interlinked concepts – capital, habitus and field – in the structuring of healthcare choice. These are offered as an alternative to rational choice theory, where ‘choice’ is regarded uncritically as a fundamental ‘good’ and able to provide a solution to the problems of the healthcare system. The authors argue that sociological analyses of healthcare choice must take greater account of the ‘field’ in which choices are made in order to better explain the structuring of choice.
No related grants have been discovered for Marika Franklin.