ORCID Profile
0000-0002-2759-3737
Current Organisation
Murdoch University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2010
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2022
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.4182792
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 12-07-2017
Abstract: Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is now widely accepted as the best means of managing the complex interactions in marine systems. However, progress towards implementing and operationalizing it has been slow. We take a pragmatic approach to EBM. Our simple definition is balancing human activities and environmental stewardship in a multiple-use context. In this paper, we present case studies on the development and implementation of EBM in Australia. The case studies (Australia’s Ocean Policy, the Great Barrier Reef, New South Wales (NSW) marine estate, Gladstone Harbour, and South Australia and Spencer Gulf) span different spatial scales, from national to regional to local. They also cover different levels of governance or legislated mandate. We identify the key learnings, necessary components and future needs to support better implementation. These include requirements for clearly identified needs and objectives, stakeholder ownership, well defined governance frameworks, and scientific tools to deal with conflicts and trade-offs. Without all these components, multi-sector management will be difficult and there will be a tendency to maintain a focus on single sectors. While the need to manage in idual sectors remains important and is often challenging, this alone will not necessarily ensure sustainable management of marine systems confronted by increasing cumulative impacts.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-06-2021
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.25919/Y5DA-0919
Publisher: FWPA and CSIRO
Date: 2020
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 09-08-2013
DOI: 10.3390/D5030613
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-2000
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2010
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2011
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-10-2022
DOI: 10.1002/PAN3.10403
Abstract: Recognizing two decades of failure to achieve global goals and targets, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity are in the final phase of negotiating a Post‐2020 Global Bio ersity Framework for the conservation, sustainable use and benefit sharing of bio ersity. The framework attempts to set out pathways, goals and targets for the next decade to achieve positive bio ersity change. This perspective intends to help that framework set people firmly as part of nature, not apart from it. Despite work done so far through four meetings, new thinking and focus is still needed on ‘what’ changes must be conceptualized and implemented, and ‘how’ those changes are to be delivered. To help achieve that new thinking, as a broad range of people, many with a focus on aquatic systems, we highlight six key foci that offer potential to strengthen delivery of the framework and break the ‘business as usual’ logjam. These foci are as follows: (i) a reframing of the narrative of ‘people's relationship with the rest of nature’ and emphasize the crucial role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in delivering positive bio ersity change (ii) moving beyond a focus on species and places by prioritizing ecosystem function and resilience (iii) supporting a ersity of top‐down and bottom‐up governance processes (iv) embracing new technologies to make and measure progress (v) linking business more effectively with bio ersity and (vi) leveraging the power of international agencies and programmes. Given they are linked to a greater or lesser degree, implementing these six foci together will lead to a much‐needed broadening of the framework, especially those of business and broader urban civil society, as well as those of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2020
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.20HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.010
Publisher: Schweizerbart
Date: 06-2003
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2017
Publisher: CSIRO
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.25919/R9WG-1V84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 18-03-2015
Publisher: Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
Date: 2021
DOI: 10.5334/IJIC.5679
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-10-2018
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 12-08-2015
Publisher: Schweizerbart
Date: 24-03-2022
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 05-01-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2005
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2015
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2010
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2018
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 1999
No related grants have been discovered for Ian Cresswell.