ORCID Profile
0000-0002-9543-1991
Current Organisation
University of Tasmania
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 22-07-2021
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-05-2021
DOI: 10.1002/JMRS.472
Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning (TP) due to superior soft tissue definition compared to computed tomography (CT). However, inherent distortions in MRI can affect treatment accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop a model to visualise the effect of MRI distortion on LGK SRS target coverage. A model was developed using MR images of a QUASAR TM GRID 3D QA phantom. One hundred and twenty‐five points were compared against known phantom geometry. Using linear interpolation, the model was applied retrospectively to 10 brain metastases patient data sets treated with LGK. The model estimated the corrected shot position accounting for distortion. A total of 44 metastases were investigated regarding the effects of MRI distortion on target coverage. The model indicated significantly reduced mean error by 0.30 mm and variance by 0.09 mm ( P = 0.008). After model application, 23 (53%) metastases showed reduced coverage. Six of the 23 metastases were deemed to be potentially clinically significant changes. Results indicated MRI distortion had a greater effect on smaller targets (mean 0.06cc) located further away from the image isocentre (mean 64.88 mm). This study developed a model to visualise the effect of MRI distortion on LGK SRS target coverage. Results suggest that MRI distortion can affect target coverage and the developed model may be one method to assess its impact. These results indicate that MRI distortion may have a greater effect on smaller targets located at the image periphery.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2012
DOI: 10.1016/J.INJURY.2011.12.010
Abstract: Patients who have sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury require appropriate management in the immediate post-injury period for both survival and to reduce the chances of costly and disabling permanent neurological deficits. Emerging time-critical neuroprotective therapies require the prompt recognition and transfer of patients to a specialised centre for early intervention. The Ambulance Research Institute, with the New South Wales State Spinal Cord Injury Service retrospectively linked prehospital data to spinal cord injury unit (SCIU) outcome data for all 324 patients transported by ambulance and subsequently admitted to a SCIU with a persisting traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) between January 2004 and June 2008, with the aim of identifying factors that impact on the provision of timely and appropriate care. Paramedics appropriately managed 88% of SCI patients. Only 4.9% of patients had initial vital signs potentially indicative of neurological injury. The median time to a SCIU was 12h, with 60% of patients undergoing multiple transfers. The odds of reaching a SCIU in over 24h were 1.71 times greater for patients injured in a major city (95% CI 1.00-2.90) in comparison to other areas of NSW. More SCI patients with multiple trauma experienced delays in reaching a SCIU (59%), compared to patients with isolated SCI (40% p=0.039). Patients initially transported to a designated major trauma centre were more likely to be delayed in reaching a SCIU, regardless of whether their injury was an isolated SCI or associated with multiple trauma, compared with other patients. Patients who took greater than 24h to reach a SCIU were 2.5 times more likely to develop a secondary complication (95% CI 1.51-4.17, p=0.0004). Patients who sustained their SCI as a result of a low fall were older and less likely to have their SCI identified and treated early, with less than half of this group reaching a SCIU within 24h compared with other SCI patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, p=0.004). Early recognition, appropriate prehospital management, triage, timely and appropriate interfacility transfers of all SCI patients are critical for access to specialised care and reducing preventable complications. Elderly fallers present particular challenges to early identification.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2023
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-02-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2021
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 20-10-2020
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000892
Abstract: This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2022
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 03-2022
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001017
Abstract: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient cord management at birth for preterm and term infants devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth family presence during neonatal resuscitation self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2019
DOI: 10.1016/J.RESUSCITATION.2019.04.003
Abstract: To systematically review the literature on advanced airway management during adult cardiac arrest in order to inform the International Liaison Committee of Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science and treatment recommendations. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018115556). We searched Medline, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews for controlled trials and observational studies published before October 30, 2018. The population included adult patients with cardiac arrest. Two investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of in idual studies. We included 78 observational studies and 11 controlled trials. Most of the observational studies and all of the controlled trials only included patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The risk of bias for in idual observational studies was overall assessed as critical or serious, with confounding and selection bias being the primary sources of bias. Three of the controlled trials, all published in 2018, were powered for clinical outcomes with two comparing a supraglottic airway to tracheal intubation and one comparing bag-mask ventilation to tracheal intubation. All three trials had some concerns regarding risk of bias primarily due to lack of blinding and variable adherence to the protocol. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies, for both the observational studies and the controlled trials, precluded any meaningful meta-analyses. We identified a large number of studies related to advanced airway management in adult cardiac arrest. Three recently published, large randomized trials in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest will help to inform future guidelines. Trials of advanced airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest are lacking.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 07-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2021
No related grants have been discovered for Suzanne Avis.