ORCID Profile
0000-0002-8693-0457
Current Organisation
Deakin University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: The Endocrine Society
Date: 22-11-2020
Abstract: Impact micro-indentation (IMI) measures bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo. This study investigated how IMI is associated with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry parameters in men. BMSi was measured on the tibial plateau using the OsteoProbe in 377 men (age 33-96 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and stiffness index (SI) were assessed at the calcaneus using an ultrasonometer. Areal BMD was measured at several skeletal sites using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Linear associations between parameters were tested using Pearson’s correlation. Multivariable regression techniques were used to determine associations between BMSi and other measures of bone, independent of confounders. BMSi was negatively correlated with age (r = –0.171, P = .001), weight (r = –0.100, P = .052), and body mass index (r = –0.187, P = .001), and positively with height (r = +0.109, P = .034). There was some evidence to support a positive association between BMSi and BUA (β = 0.052, P = .037), SOS (β = 0.013, P = .144), and SI (β = 0.036, P = .051). After age adjustment, this association was attenuated. No correlations were observed between BMSi and BMD at any skeletal site (r values ranged from –0.006 to +0.079, all P ≥ .13). There was a small positive association between BMSi and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters, which were not independent of age. No associations were detected between BMSi and BMD. This suggests that BMSi and QUS are capturing common age-dependent properties of bone. Further research on the utility of IMI alone and complementary to conventional bone testing methods for predicting fracture risk is warranted.
Publisher: The Endocrine Society
Date: 16-07-2019
Abstract: Impact microindentation (IMI) measures bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo. However, clinical risk factors that affect BMSi are largely unknown. This study investigated associations between BMSi and clinical risk factors for fracture in men. BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe in 357 men (ages 33 to 96 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Risk factors included age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), parental hip fracture, prior fracture, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), secondary osteoporosis, smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, medications, diseases, and low serum vitamin D levels. BMSi was negatively associated with age (r = −0.131, P = 0.014), weight (r = −0.109, P = 0.040), and BMI (r = −0.083, P = 0.001) no correlations were detected with BMD (r = 0.000, P = 0.998) or height (r = 0.087, P = 0.10). Mean BMSi values for men with and without prior fracture were 80.2 ± 6.9 vs 82.8 ± 6.1 (P = 0.024) parental hip fracture, 80.1 ± 6.1 vs 82.8 ± 6.9 (P = 0.029) and T2DM, 80.3 ± 8.5 vs 82.9 ± 6.6 (P = 0.059). BMSi did not differ in the presence vs absence of other risk factors. In multivariable models, mean (± SD) BMSi remained associated with prior fracture and parental hip fracture after adjusting for age and BMI: prior fracture (80.5 ± 1.1 vs 82.8 ± 0.4, P = 0.044) parental fracture (79.9 ± 1.2 vs 82.9 ± 0.4, P = 0.015). No other confounders were identified. We conclude that in men, BMSi discriminates prior fracture and parental hip fracture, which are both known to increase the risk for incident fracture. These findings suggest that IMI may be useful for identifying men who have an increased risk for fracture.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 02-02-2023
DOI: 10.1007/S00223-022-01047-Y
Abstract: Impact microindentation (IMI) is a novel technique for assessing bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. The aim of this study was to define the reference intervals for men and women by evaluating healthy adults from the United States of America, Europe and Australia. Participants included community-based volunteers and participants drawn from clinical and population-based studies. BMSi was measured on the tibial diaphysis using an OsteoProbe in 479 healthy adults (197 male and 282 female, ages 25 to 98 years) across seven research centres, between 2011 and 2018. Associations between BMSi, age, sex and areal bone mineral density (BMD) were examined following an a posteriori method. Unitless BMSi values ranged from 48 to 101. The mean (± standard deviation) BMSi for men was 84.4 ± 6.9 and for women, 79.0 ± 9.1. Healthy reference intervals for BMSi were identified as 71.0 to 97.9 for men and 59.8 to 95.2 for women. This study provides healthy reference data that can be used to calculate T- and Z-scores for BMSi and assist in determining the utility of BMSi in fracture prediction. These data will be useful for positioning in iduals within the population and for identifying those with BMSi at the extremes of the population.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2018
Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Date: 31-12-2013
DOI: 10.2174/1389450114666131220160357
Abstract: Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder that affects both men and women worldwide. It causes low bone mass and therefore increases bone susceptibility to fracture when bone undergoes a minor trauma. Lack of estrogen is the principal cause of osteoporosis. Estrogen, calcium, calcitonin, vitamin D and several antioxidants help in the prevention of osteoporosis. In order to effectively treat osteoporosis, there has been an extended research on the biological activities of traditional medicines since synthetic medicines possess several side effects that reduce their efficacy. Therefore, there is a need to develop new treatment alternatives for osteoporosis. This review centres on the scientific researches carried out on the evaluation of Chinese traditional medicines in the treatment of osteoporosis. Various plants like Achyranthes bidentata, Davallia formosana, polygonatum sibiricum, Cibotium barometz, Er-Zhi-Wan, Curculigo orchioides and a combined treatment of Hachimi-jio-gan (Ba-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan) with alendronate proved active in preventing post-menopausal osteoporosis.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 13-01-2022
DOI: 10.1007/S00223-021-00939-9
Abstract: Accumulation of fat in the liver and skeletal muscle is associated with obesity and poor health outcomes. Liver steatosis is a characteristic of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and myosteatosis, of poor muscle quality in sarcopenia. In this study of 403 men (33–96 years), we investigated associations between the fatty liver index (FLI) and muscle density, as markers of fat accumulation in these organs. We also investigated associations between the FLI and parameters of sarcopenia, including DXA-derived appendicular lean mass (ALM) and handgrip strength by dynamometry. Muscle density was measured using pQCT at the radius and tibia. FLI was calculated from BMI, waist circumference, and levels of triglycerides and gamma-glutamyltransferase. There was a pattern of decreasing muscle density across increasing quartiles of FLI. After adjusting for age and lifestyle, mean radial muscle density in Q4 was 2.1% lower than Q1 ( p 0.001) and mean tibial muscle density was 1.8% lower in Q3 and 3.0% lower in Q4, compared to Q1 ( p = 0.022 and 0.001, respectively). After adjusting for age and sedentary lifestyle, participants in the highest FLI quartile were sixfold more likely to have sarcopenia. In conclusion, our results suggest that fat accumulation in the liver co-exists with fat infiltration into skeletal muscle.
Publisher: OMICS Publishing Group
Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2020
DOI: 10.1016/J.BONE.2020.115241
Abstract: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for fracture. The ability of bone mineral density (BMD) to predict fractures in CKD patients has been inconsistent. Other measures such as trabecular bone score (TBS) and impact microindentation (IMI) may be more useful in this group. This study aimed to determine if TBS or IMI values differed between men with and without CKD and examine associations between prior fracture, TBS and IMI values. Men (n = 343, age 33-96 yr) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. Femoral neck (FNBMD) and lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) were measured using DXA (Lunar ProdigyPro). TBS was determined from lumbar spine scans (TBS iNsight software Version 2.2). IMI values (bone material strength index BMSi) were measured using an OsteoProbe. CKD was defined as an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m Men with CKD tended to have a higher likelihood of prior fracture (adjusted OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.02-5.01). Higher BMSi was associated with a lower likelihood of prior fracture (adjusted OR for 1SD increase: 0.70 95%CI 0.51-0.97). This association was sustained after adjustment for FNBMD (OR 0.68 95%CI 0.49-0.96) or LSBMD (OR 0.69 95%CI 0.49-0.95). No interaction was detected between BMSi and CKD (p = 0.898). No associations were detected between FNBMD, LSBMD or TBS and prior fracture in either population and there were no interactions with CKD for FNBMD, LSBMD or TBS. BMSi was associated with prior fracture in men with and without CKD, however, FNBMD, LSBMD and TBS were not. Lack of an interaction term suggests that BMSi performed similarly in identifying the likelihood of prior fracture, regardless of CKD status. IMI may have clinical utility for assessing fracture risk in patients with CKD.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 20-12-2019
DOI: 10.1007/S00223-018-0506-1
Abstract: Recommendations from the FNIH Sarcopenia Project are that appendicular lean mass (ALM, kg) adjusted for body mass index (BMI, kg/m
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 04-09-2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2021
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 10-09-2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2022
DOI: 10.1016/J.BONE.2021.116268
Abstract: Bone material strength index (BMSi) is measured in vivo using impact microindentation (IMI). However, the associations between BMSi and other bone measures are not clear. This study investigated whether bone parameters derived by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) are associated with BMSi. Participants were men (n = 373, ages 34-96 yr) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured using an OsteoProbe (Active Life Scientific, USA). Bone measures were obtained at both the radius (n = 348) and tibia (n = 342) using pQCT (XCT 2000 Stratec Medizintechnik, Germany). Images were obtained at 4% and 66% of radial and tibial length. Associations between pQCT parameters and BMSi were tested using Spearman's correlation and multivariable regression used to determine independent associations after adjustment for potential confounders. Models were checked for interaction terms. Weak associations were observed between total bone density (radius 4% r = +0.108, p = 0.046, tibia 4% r = +0.115, p = 0.035), cortical density (tibia 4% r = +0.123, p = 0.023) and BMSi. The associations were independent of weight, height, and glucocorticoid use (total bone density: radius 4% β = 0.020, p = 0.006, tibia 4% β = 0.020, p = 0.027 and cortical density: radius 4% β = 4.160, p = 0.006, tibia 4% β = 0.038, p = 0.010). Associations with bone mass were also observed at the 66% radial and tibial site, independent of age, weight, and glucocorticoid use (β = 4.160, p = 0.053, β = 1.458, p = 0.027 respectively). Total area at the 66% tibial site was also associated with BMSi (β = 0.010, p = 0.012), independent of weight and glucocorticoid use. No interaction terms were identified. There were weak associations detected between some pQCT-derived bone parameters and BMSi.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 18-07-2020
DOI: 10.1002/JBM4.10384
Publisher: BMJ
Date: 12-2018
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-023959
Abstract: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and tolerability of using the OsteoProbe in men enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in a population-based study. Barwon Statistical Division, southeastern Australia, 2016–2018. For 252 of 345 consecutive participants (ages 33–96 years), BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe at the mid-tibia. Immediately following measurement, each participant used a Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) to rate the level of discomfort that was anticipated and experienced, their initial reluctance towards the measurement and their willingness to repeat measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 92 men were needle phobia (n=8), discomfort after first indentation (n=5), skin infections (n=21), excessive soft tissues around the mid-tibia region (n=56), inability to provide informed consent (n=2). Among 252 men who had IMI measures, the expectation for pain during measurement was low (1.54±1.56), as was actual pain experienced (0.38±0.71). Reluctance to undergo measurement was low (0.34±0.93). All participants indicated a willingness to have the measurement performed again. Mean (±SD) BMSi was 83.0±6.4 (range 62.3–93.0). In this study, the procedure was well accepted by participants suggesting that IMI testing with the OsteoProbe is feasible in a research setting.
No related grants have been discovered for Pamela Rufus.