ORCID Profile
0000-0002-0010-1229
Current Organisation
Murdoch University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2013
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2353263
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2001
Publisher: Duke University Press
Date: 05-1994
DOI: 10.2307/2059931
Publisher: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute
Date: 2009
DOI: 10.1355/AE26-2G
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 12-2001
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2008
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2006
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2006
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2000
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-01-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-09-2021
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 06-2001
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2006
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 21-03-2017
Abstract: Proposals for regional economic integration, namely, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the One Belt One Road proposal, have recently been driving the security dynamics of the Asian region. To explain the growing ‘economic’ focus of states’ foreign policies, we need to go beyond the dominant approaches in International Relations and International Political Economy, which are limited in their analytical power because they often make a distinction between politics/security and economics, and prioritise one over the other, rather than seeing them as internally related. Drawing on Leon Trotsky’s theory of ‘uneven and combined development’ and Nicos Poulantzas’s notion of ‘internalised transformations’, we develop a ‘Poulantzian-uneven and combined development’ framework to argue that the increased focus on economics in foreign policymaking represents a fundamental change related to the transnationalisation of capitalist state-building projects. The paper argues that while the Trans-Pacific Partnership reflected an attempt by the Obama administration to fashion a new stage in the transnationalisation of American capital, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal reflect an emerging China-centred transnationalised state project. We characterise the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal as constituting different forms of a particular type of geoeconomic strategy called ‘regulatory geographies’ because they entail the export of distinctive modes of regulatory governance that aim to overcome key contradictions of uneven and combined capitalist development in the US and China. As the recent demise of the Trans-Pacific Partnership with the election of Donald Trump shows, however, these transnationalised state projects generate resistance and contestation within, as well as between, states.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 31-01-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2004
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2006
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2002
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2009
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-2009
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-1996
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Date: 14-08-1995
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2006
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-03-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-02-2010
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 28-05-2012
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 1999
DOI: 10.2307/20637822
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-1994
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-1998
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-02-2010
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2009
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1352770
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1997
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 02-2005
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-2015
DOI: 10.1111/ASPP.12224
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 27-06-2013
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2010
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2002
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-03-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1998
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2001
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-01-2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 13-11-2008
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2001
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 24-03-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2008
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 05-02-2011
DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9248.2010.00854.X
Abstract: This article examines the emergence and politics of new modes of regional governance understood as a form of regulatory regionalism. Regulatory regionalism is defined in terms of the institutional spaces of regional regulation functioning within ostensibly national policy and political institutions. The central insight of this essay is that the politics of this regulatory regionalism can be conceptualised as a system of territorial politics fought out and accommodated across the institutional space of the state. The emphasis on territorial politics highlights the fact that strategic moves within institutional space are shaped by the political context in which the regional and ‘regionalising’ actors operate. From our perspective regulatory regionalism is a distinctive method of boundary control over overlapping political arenas, which brings into play a system of territorial politics within the state. We test this argument through an examination of regional governance in the Asia-Pacific region which is often thought of as being inhospitable to such governance innovation.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-08-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-2003
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-2003
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2007
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Date: 10-2004
Abstract: Globalisation has transformed the internal architecture of the state, leading to the emergence of a new form of regulatory state that operates through mechanisms of metagovernance – that is, the governance of governance. This has important implications for various models of policy capacity. Conventional accounts of policy capacity embody an attribute model of capacity that seeks to identify a set of transformative powers over policy and structure. In contrast, the new regulatory state requires that capacity be understood as a relational term that structures various sites of governance and links dispersed regulatory resources and agents.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1996
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-12-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2007
Publisher: Duke University Press
Date: 02-2000
DOI: 10.2307/2658593
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-11-2021
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 31-07-2004
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-07-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-12-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1994
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 21-03-2017
Abstract: Proposals for regional economic integration, namely, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the One Belt One Road proposal, have recently been driving the security dynamics of the Asian region. To explain the growing ‘economic’ focus of states’ foreign policies, we need to go beyond the dominant approaches in International Relations and International Political Economy, which are limited in their analytical power because they often make a distinction between politics/security and economics, and prioritise one over the other, rather than seeing them as internally related. Drawing on Leon Trotsky’s theory of ‘uneven and combined development’ and Nicos Poulantzas’s notion of ‘internalised transformations’, we develop a ‘Poulantzian-uneven and combined development’ framework to argue that the increased focus on economics in foreign policymaking represents a fundamental change related to the transnationalisation of capitalist state-building projects. The paper argues that while the Trans-Pacific Partnership reflected an attempt by the Obama administration to fashion a new stage in the transnationalisation of American capital, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal reflect an emerging China-centred transnationalised state project. We characterise the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal as constituting different forms of a particular type of geoeconomic strategy called ‘regulatory geographies’ because they entail the export of distinctive modes of regulatory governance that aim to overcome key contradictions of uneven and combined capitalist development in the US and China. As the recent demise of the Trans-Pacific Partnership with the election of Donald Trump shows, however, these transnationalised state projects generate resistance and contestation within, as well as between, states.
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Date: 2000
DOI: 10.1075/AIOS.2.07JAY
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-02-2009
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1996
No related grants have been discovered for kanishka Jayasuriya.